I haven’t had the opportunity to conduct a thorough analysis of the lengthy ruling in United States v. Dávila-Reyes from the First Circuit. However, I’ve attached the decision for all our MDLEA enthusiasts to enjoy. The decision should make for some engaging bedtime reading! Link: MDLEA_Blog-First_Circuit-Dávila-Reyes
Category: Blog
MDLEA blog posts.
What is hot pursuit in the maritime domain?
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) allows a state to extend their coastal state authority beyond its territorial seas in limited circumstances. Article 111, which allows for the right of hot pursuit, is one of those situations, and the right of hot pursuit is an exception to the general rule that a…
What does it mean when a vessel is outfitted for smuggling?
MDLEA’s Section 70503(a)(3) makes it illegal for an individual to “knowingly or intentionally … conceal, or attempt or conspire to conceal, more than $100,000 in currency … aboard the covered vessel if that vessel is outfitted for smuggling.” But what does it mean for a vessel to be “outfitted for smuggling[?]” A recent District Court…
Simple possession of controlled substances under the MDLEA
Let’s start by limiting the scope of this post. This post is only going provide information for simple possession under the MDLEA, not under Title 21. See e.g., 21 U.S.C. § 844 (“It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled substance…”). In general, extraterritorial application of federal criminal law…
Judge Besosa in the District of Puerto Rico issues two decisions concerning the Constitutionality of the MDLEA
Judge Besosa in the District of Puerto Rico issued two recent decisions that address, among other things, arguments against the Constitutionality of the MDLEA: (1) U.S. v. Hernandez-Gamboa, No. CR 21-323 (FAB), 2023 WL 5199393 (D.P.R. Aug. 14, 2023); and (2) U.S. v. Martinez-Felipe, et al., No. CR 20-359 (FAB), 2023 WL 5290124 (D.P.R. Aug….
Southern District of Florida Court evaluates speedy trial requirement in relation to MDLEA interdictions
The convergence of the Sixth Amendment’s speedy trial requirement and the delay before presentment following an MDLEA interdiction often raises complex issues. On one hand, the government must have the ability to continue its mission of countering drug smuggling without overly disrupting its operations following an interdiction. On the other hand, individuals apprehended during these…
Second Circuit rules that the MDLEA does not require a nexus for stateless vessels and that Congress did not exceed its authority under Article I of the Constitution in enacting the MDLEA
It’s been about four months since we’ve seen a circuit court decision concerning the MDLEA. Well, the wait is over. The Second Circuit recently had to address the Constitutionality of prosecuting co-conspirators for their land-based activities under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA) in United States v. Antonius, No. 21-1083, 2023 WL 4410951 (2d…
Defendants Liable under MDLEA for Acts of Co-Conspirators Committed on High Seas When Foreign State Consents to Jurisdiction
If you’re a self-proclaimed MDLEA enthusiast—and I’m assuming you are, given your interest in this blog—then you’ll appreciate Judge Besosa’s recent decision in U.S. v. Barbosa-Rodriguez, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 4230143 (D.P.R. June 28, 2023) where he concludes that Congress did not exceed its authority in enacting the MDLEA and denies defendants’ motion to…
Puerto Rico District Court Rules the Term “High Seas” Includes the EEZ of the Dominican Republic
Lately, there has been a recurring argument presented by defendants involved in MDLEA prosecutions. In short, the argument asserts that foreign states have exclusive jurisdiction over criminal activity in their exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and thus, U.S. courts lack jurisdiction to hear cases where the criminal conduct—i.e. the MDLEA violation—occurred in that foreign state’s EEZ….
U.S. Government Did Not Violate Fed. R. Crim. P. Rule 5 Even Where Defendants Spent Ten Days at Sea on Three Different Ships
On 13 June 2023, we looked at a Southern District of Florida case where Magistrate Judge Torres decided that the U.S. Government violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(a)(1)(B) for an “unnecessary” 11-day delay in presenting defendants to a magistrate judge following a MDLEA interdiction by the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). Well, just over a…